linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 013/113] drm/amdkfd: Fix a potential memory leak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 21:21:40 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Oak Zeng <ozeng@....com>,
        Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 013/113] drm/amdkfd: Fix a potential memory leak

[ Upstream commit e73390d181103a19e1111ec2f25559a0570e9fe0 ]

Free mqd_mem_obj it GTT buffer allocation for MQD+control stack fails.

Signed-off-by: Oak Zeng <ozeng@....com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v9.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v9.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v9.c
index 0cedb37cf513..985bebde5a34 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v9.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v9.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ static int init_mqd(struct mqd_manager *mm, void **mqd,
 	struct v9_mqd *m;
 	struct kfd_dev *kfd = mm->dev;
 
+	*mqd_mem_obj = NULL;
 	/* From V9,  for CWSR, the control stack is located on the next page
 	 * boundary after the mqd, we will use the gtt allocation function
 	 * instead of sub-allocation function.
@@ -92,8 +93,10 @@ static int init_mqd(struct mqd_manager *mm, void **mqd,
 	} else
 		retval = kfd_gtt_sa_allocate(mm->dev, sizeof(struct v9_mqd),
 				mqd_mem_obj);
-	if (retval != 0)
+	if (retval) {
+		kfree(*mqd_mem_obj);
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
 
 	m = (struct v9_mqd *) (*mqd_mem_obj)->cpu_ptr;
 	addr = (*mqd_mem_obj)->gpu_addr;
-- 
2.20.1