[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190729190811.906620918@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 21:22:59 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Eiichi Tsukata <devel@...ukata.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 183/215] x86/stacktrace: Prevent access_ok() warnings in arch_stack_walk_user()
From: Eiichi Tsukata <devel@...ukata.com>
commit 2af7c85714d8cafadf925d55441458eae312cd6b upstream.
When arch_stack_walk_user() is called from atomic contexts, access_ok() can
trigger the following warning if compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y.
Reproducer:
// CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y
# cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
# echo 1 > options/userstacktrace
# echo 1 > events/irq/irq_handler_entry/enable
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2649 at arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c:103 arch_stack_walk_user+0x6e/0xf6
CPU: 0 PID: 2649 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.3.0-rc1+ #99
RIP: 0010:arch_stack_walk_user+0x6e/0xf6
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
stack_trace_save_user+0x10a/0x16d
trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x185/0x240
trace_event_buffer_commit+0xec/0x330
trace_event_raw_event_irq_handler_entry+0x159/0x1e0
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x22d/0x440
handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x100
handle_irq_event+0x5a/0x8b
handle_edge_irq+0x12f/0x3f0
handle_irq+0x34/0x40
do_IRQ+0xa6/0x1f0
common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
</IRQ>
Fix it by calling __range_not_ok() directly instead of access_ok() as
copy_from_user_nmi() does. This is fine here because the actual copy is
inside a pagefault disabled region.
Reported-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <devel@...ukata.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722083216.16192-2-devel@etsukata.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ copy_stack_frame(const void __user *fp,
{
int ret;
- if (!access_ok(fp, sizeof(*frame)))
+ if (__range_not_ok(fp, sizeof(*frame), TASK_SIZE))
return 0;
ret = 1;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists