linux-kernel - Re: next/master boot: 254 boots: 16 failed, 231 passed with 4 offline, 1 untried/unknown, 2 conflicts (next-20190726)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 28 Jul 2019 17:56:41 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: next/master boot: 254 boots: 16 failed, 231 passed with 4
 offline, 1 untried/unknown, 2 conflicts (next-20190726)

On Fri 26 Jul 06:48 PDT 2019, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 05:18:01AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> 
> The past few versions of -next failed to boot on apq8096-db820c:
> 
> >     defconfig:
> >         gcc-8:
> >             apq8096-db820c: 1 failed lab
> 
> with an RCU stall towards the end of boot:
> 
> 00:03:40.521336  [   18.487538] qcom_q6v5_pas adsp-pil: adsp-pil supply px not found, using dummy regulator
> 00:04:01.523104  [   39.499613] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> 00:04:01.533371  [   39.499657] rcu: 	2-...!: (0 ticks this GP) idle=9ca/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=1450/1450 fqs=50
> 00:04:01.537544  [   39.504689] 	(detected by 0, t=5252 jiffies, g=2425, q=619)
> 00:04:01.541727  [   39.513539] Task dump for CPU 2:
> 00:04:01.547929  [   39.519096] seq             R  running task        0   199    198 0x00000000
> 
> Full details and logs at:
> 
> 	https://kernelci.org/boot/id/5d3aa7ea59b5142ba868890f/
> 
> The last version that worked was from the 15th and there seem to be
> similar issues in mainline since -rc1.

Thanks for the report Mark, afaict the problem showed up in v5.3-rc1 as
well.

I think the problem is that the regulator supplying the GPU power
domain(s) isn't enabled - and I think there's a lack of agreement of how
this should be controlled.

But we have a partial fix for this floating around, I will give it a
spin.

Regards,
Bjorn