[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D036FA27-FA50-445D-BEFA-1CD384A7478B@vmware.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:19:19 +0000
From: Matt Helsley <mhelsley@...are.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] objtool: Make recordmcount into an objtool
subcmd
> On Jul 28, 2019, at 10:48 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 02:05:04PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
>> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.build b/scripts/Makefile.build
>> index 08b70ee9614a..43707491317c 100644
>> --- a/scripts/Makefile.build
>> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.build
>> @@ -170,22 +170,21 @@ endif
>>
>> ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
>> ifndef CC_USING_RECORD_MCOUNT
>> -# compiler will not generate __mcount_loc use recordmcount or recordmcount.pl
>> -ifdef BUILD_C_RECORDMCOUNT
>> +# compiler will not generate __mcount_loc use objtool mcount record or recordmcount.pl
>
> This comment could use some English-ification, something like:
>
> # The compiler doesn't support generation of the __mcount_loc section.
> # Generate it manually with "objtool mcount record" or recordmcount.pl.
OK, makes sense.
>
>> @@ -236,9 +235,10 @@ endif # SKIP_STACK_VALIDATION
>> endif # CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION
>>
>> # Rebuild all objects when objtool changes, or is enabled/disabled.
>> -objtool_dep = $(objtool_obj) \
>> +objtool_dep += $(objtool_obj) \
>> $(wildcard include/config/orc/unwinder.h \
>> - include/config/stack/validation.h)
>> + include/config/stack/validation.h \
>> + include/config/ftrace/mcount/record.h)
>
> I think the '+=' isn't needed as this is the only place objtool_dep gets
> set?
Indeed. I think this is an artifact of the way I initially wrote these changes — I tried to eliminate some recordmcount variables by using objtool_dep in the recordmcount portions of the Makefile. Then I realized the .config variable combinations meant the most clearly-correct way to write it is still with separate variables.
Will fix so it’s clear this is the only assignment.
Cheers,
-Matt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists