| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <01d0c12b-e749-42a0-66c2-4922b482030f@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:14:14 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to read source block before
invalidating it
On 2019/7/29 13:54, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 07/23, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/7/23 9:27, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 07/18, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 2019/7/18 12:00, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>> On 07/18, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>> On 2019/7/18 11:12, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>> f2fs_allocate_data_block() invalidates old block address and enable new block
>>>>>>> address. Then, if we try to read old block by f2fs_submit_page_bio(), it will
>>>>>>> give WARN due to reading invalid blocks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's make the order sanely back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm.. to avoid WARM, we may suffer one more memcpy, I suspect this can reduce
>>>>>> online resize or foreground gc ioctl performance...
>>>>>
>>>>> I worried about performance tho, more concern came to me that there may exist a
>>>>> chance that other thread can allocate and write something in old block address.
>>>>
>>>> Me too, however, previous invalid block address should be reused after a
>>>> checkpoint, and checkpoint should have invalidated meta cache already, so there
>>>> shouldn't be any race here.
>>>
>>> I think SSR can reuse that before checkpoint.
>>
>> Yes, I should have considered that when I introduced readahead feature for
>> migration of block, we've kept invalidating meta page cache in old block address
>> whenever the block address is not valid.
>>
>> quoted from ("f2fs: readahead encrypted block during GC")
>>
>> "Note that for OPU, truncation, deletion, we need to invalid meta
>> page after we invalid old block address, to make sure we won't load
>> invalid data from target meta page during encrypted block migration."
>>
>> But to avoid potential issue, how about just enable meta page cache during GC?
>> that is saying we should truncate all valid meta cache after one section has
>> been moved.
>
> We may need to invalidate metapage when writing new data, which looks like
> different issue.
Yeah, we have already did this as below:
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 7dcfe38..30779aa 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -2079,6 +2079,8 @@ void f2fs_invalidate_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
block_t addr)
if (addr == NEW_ADDR)
return;
+ invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(sbi), addr, addr);
+
/* add it into sit main buffer */
down_write(&sit_i->sentry_lock);
@@ -2978,6 +2980,9 @@ static void do_write_page(struct f2fs_summary *sum, struct
f2fs_io_info *fio)
reallocate:
f2fs_allocate_data_block(fio->sbi, fio->page, fio->old_blkaddr,
&fio->new_blkaddr, sum, type, fio, true);
+ if (GET_SEGNO(fio->sbi, fio->old_blkaddr) != NULL_SEGNO)
+ invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(fio->sbi),
+ fio->old_blkaddr, fio->old_blkaddr);
/* writeout dirty page into bdev */
f2fs_submit_page_write(fio);
@@ -3132,8 +3137,11 @@ void f2fs_do_replace_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct f2fs_summary *sum,
if (!recover_curseg || recover_newaddr)
update_sit_entry(sbi, new_blkaddr, 1);
- if (GET_SEGNO(sbi, old_blkaddr) != NULL_SEGNO)
+ if (GET_SEGNO(sbi, old_blkaddr) != NULL_SEGNO) {
+ invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(sbi),
+ old_blkaddr, old_blkaddr);
update_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, -1);
+ }
locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, old_blkaddr));
locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, new_blkaddr));
>
>>
>> One more concern is whether below case exists during SSR?
>> - write 4k to fileA;
>> - fsync fileA, 4k data is writebacked to lbaA;
>> - write 4k to fileA;
>> - kworker flushs 4k to lbaB; dnode contain lbaB didn't be persisted yet;
>> - write 4k to fileB;
>> - kworker flush 4k to lbaA due to SSR;
>> - SPOR -> dnode with lbaA will be recovered, however lbaA contains fileB's data..
>
> Yes, it seems that's possible. We may need to keep another bitmap to record
> all the block allocation?
Yup, let me think about the implementation. :)
Thanks,
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * invalidate intermediate page cache borrowed from meta inode
>>>> * which are used for migration of encrypted inode's blocks.
>>>> */
>>>> if (f2fs_sb_has_encrypt(sbi))
>>>> invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(sbi),
>>>> MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi), MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) - 1);
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can we just relief to use DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ for this case...?
>>>>>
>>>>> We need to keep consistency for this api.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Except performance, I'm okay with this change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>>> I was fixing the comments. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>>>>> index 6691f526fa40..8974672db78f 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>>>>> @@ -796,6 +796,29 @@ static int move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx,
>>>>>>> if (lfs_mode)
>>>>>>> down_write(&fio.sbi->io_order_lock);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + mpage = f2fs_grab_cache_page(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi),
>>>>>>> + fio.old_blkaddr, false);
>>>>>>> + if (!mpage)
>>>>>>> + goto up_out;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + fio.encrypted_page = mpage;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + /* read source block in mpage */
>>>>>>> + if (!PageUptodate(mpage)) {
>>>>>>> + err = f2fs_submit_page_bio(&fio);
>>>>>>> + if (err) {
>>>>>>> + f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1);
>>>>>>> + goto up_out;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + lock_page(mpage);
>>>>>>> + if (unlikely(mpage->mapping != META_MAPPING(fio.sbi) ||
>>>>>>> + !PageUptodate(mpage))) {
>>>>>>> + err = -EIO;
>>>>>>> + f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1);
>>>>>>> + goto up_out;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> f2fs_allocate_data_block(fio.sbi, NULL, fio.old_blkaddr, &newaddr,
>>>>>>> &sum, CURSEG_COLD_DATA, NULL, false);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @@ -803,44 +826,18 @@ static int move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx,
>>>>>>> newaddr, FGP_LOCK | FGP_CREAT, GFP_NOFS);
>>>>>>> if (!fio.encrypted_page) {
>>>>>>> err = -ENOMEM;
>>>>>>> - goto recover_block;
>>>>>>> - }
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> - mpage = f2fs_pagecache_get_page(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi),
>>>>>>> - fio.old_blkaddr, FGP_LOCK, GFP_NOFS);
>>>>>>> - if (mpage) {
>>>>>>> - bool updated = false;
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> - if (PageUptodate(mpage)) {
>>>>>>> - memcpy(page_address(fio.encrypted_page),
>>>>>>> - page_address(mpage), PAGE_SIZE);
>>>>>>> - updated = true;
>>>>>>> - }
>>>>>>> f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1);
>>>>>>> - invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi),
>>>>>>> - fio.old_blkaddr, fio.old_blkaddr);
>>>>>>> - if (updated)
>>>>>>> - goto write_page;
>>>>>>> - }
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> - err = f2fs_submit_page_bio(&fio);
>>>>>>> - if (err)
>>>>>>> - goto put_page_out;
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> - /* write page */
>>>>>>> - lock_page(fio.encrypted_page);
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> - if (unlikely(fio.encrypted_page->mapping != META_MAPPING(fio.sbi))) {
>>>>>>> - err = -EIO;
>>>>>>> - goto put_page_out;
>>>>>>> - }
>>>>>>> - if (unlikely(!PageUptodate(fio.encrypted_page))) {
>>>>>>> - err = -EIO;
>>>>>>> - goto put_page_out;
>>>>>>> + goto recover_block;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -write_page:
>>>>>>> + /* write target block */
>>>>>>> f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(fio.encrypted_page, DATA, true, true);
>>>>>>> + memcpy(page_address(fio.encrypted_page),
>>>>>>> + page_address(mpage), PAGE_SIZE);
>>>>>>> + f2fs_put_page(mpage, 1);
>>>>>>> + invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(fio.sbi),
>>>>>>> + fio.old_blkaddr, fio.old_blkaddr);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> set_page_dirty(fio.encrypted_page);
>>>>>>> if (clear_page_dirty_for_io(fio.encrypted_page))
>>>>>>> dec_page_count(fio.sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
>>>>>>> @@ -871,11 +868,12 @@ static int move_data_block(struct inode *inode, block_t bidx,
>>>>>>> put_page_out:
>>>>>>> f2fs_put_page(fio.encrypted_page, 1);
>>>>>>> recover_block:
>>>>>>> - if (lfs_mode)
>>>>>>> - up_write(&fio.sbi->io_order_lock);
>>>>>>> if (err)
>>>>>>> f2fs_do_replace_block(fio.sbi, &sum, newaddr, fio.old_blkaddr,
>>>>>>> true, true);
>>>>>>> +up_out:
>>>>>>> + if (lfs_mode)
>>>>>>> + up_write(&fio.sbi->io_order_lock);
>>>>>>> put_out:
>>>>>>> f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
>>>>>>> out:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>> .
>>>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists