[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+res+RfqpT=g1QbCqr3OkHVzFFSAt3cfCYNcwqiemWmOifFxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:58:30 +0200
From: Jack Wang <jack.wang.usish@...il.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable-4.19 1/2] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow
VMCS after guest reset
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> 于2019年7月25日周四 下午3:29写道:
>
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 88dddc11a8d6b09201b4db9d255b3394d9bc9e57 ]
>
> If a KVM guest is reset while running a nested guest, free_nested will
> disable the shadow VMCS execution control in the vmcs01. However,
> on the next KVM_RUN vmx_vcpu_run would nevertheless try to sync
> the VMCS12 to the shadow VMCS which has since been freed.
>
> This causes a vmptrld of a NULL pointer on my machime, but Jan reports
> the host to hang altogether. Let's see how much this trivial patch fixes.
>
> Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
> Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Hi all,
Do we need to backport the fix also to stable 4.14? It applies
cleanly and compiles fine.
Regards,
Jack Wang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists