[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190729101349.GX31381@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 12:13:49 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, x86@...nel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: sched: Unexpected reschedule of offline CPU#2!
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:58:24AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2019, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 09:44:50AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > [ 61.348866] Call Trace:
> > > [ 61.349392] kick_ilb+0x90/0xa0
> > > [ 61.349629] trigger_load_balance+0xf0/0x5c0
> > > [ 61.349859] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x1b0/0x1b0
> > > [ 61.350057] scheduler_tick+0xa7/0xd0
> >
> > kick_ilb() iterates nohz.idle_cpus_mask to find itself an idle_cpu().
> >
> > idle_cpus_mask() is set from nohz_balance_enter_idle() and cleared from
> > nohz_balance_exit_idle(). nohz_balance_enter_idle() is called from
> > __tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() when entering nohz idle, this includes the
> > cpu_is_offline() clause of the idle loop.
> >
> > However, when offline, cpu_active() should also be false, and this
> > function should no-op.
>
> Ha. That reboot mess is not clearing cpu active as it's not going through
> the regular cpu hotplug path. It's using reboot IPI which 'stops' the cpus
> dead in their tracks after clearing cpu online....
$string-of-cock-compliant-curses
What a trainwreck...
So if it doesn't play by the normal rules; how does it expect to work?
So what do we do? 'Fix' reboot or extend the rules?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists