[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158b26b6f3b24164aceacd2428095315@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:39:16 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Qian Cai' <cai@....pw>,
"vyasevich@...il.com" <vyasevich@...il.com>,
"nhorman@...driver.com" <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"marcelo.leitner@...il.com" <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
CC: "linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/sctp: fix GCC8+ -Wpacked-not-aligned warnings
From: Qian Cai
> Sent: 26 July 2019 21:58
>
> There are a lot of those warnings with GCC8+ 64bit,
>
...
> Fix them by aligning the structures and fields to 8 bytes instead.
...
> struct sctp_setpeerprim {
> sctp_assoc_t sspp_assoc_id;
> - struct sockaddr_storage sspp_addr;
> -} __attribute__((packed, aligned(4)));
> + struct sockaddr_storage sspp_addr __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> +} __attribute__((packed, aligned(8)));
What happens to this one if you change both to aligned(4) ?
Much the same way as:
struct {
int a;
long b __attribute__((aligned(4));
};
is only 12 bytes on (most) 64bit systems.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists