linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] sched/core: Don't use dying mm as active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25cd74fcee33dfd0b9604a8d1612187734037394.camel@surriel.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:28:04 -0400
From:   Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/core: Don't use dying mm as active_mm of
 kthreads

On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 17:03 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> The 'sad' part is that x86 already switches to init_mm on idle and we
> only keep the active_mm around for 'stupid'.

Wait, where do we do that?

> Rik and Andy were working on getting that 'fixed' a while ago, not
> sure
> where that went.

My lazy TLB stuff got merged last year. 

Did we miss a spot somewhere, where the code still
quietly switches to init_mm for no good reason?

-- 
All Rights Reversed.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)