[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXEU4eUEdNyY=K2B_Tj=unJV2eSJo1BQ8vDwZ-D-2wDWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:39:49 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sun3_scsi: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
Hi Gustavo,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 4:32 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
> Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warnings:
>
> drivers/scsi/sun3_scsi.c: warning: this statement may fall through
> [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 399:9, 403:9
>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Thanks!
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sun3_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sun3_scsi.c
> @@ -397,10 +397,12 @@ static int sun3scsi_dma_finish(int write_flag)
> case CSR_LEFT_3:
> *vaddr = (dregs->bpack_lo & 0xff00) >> 8;
> vaddr--;
> + /* Fall through */
>
> case CSR_LEFT_2:
> *vaddr = (dregs->bpack_hi & 0x00ff);
> vaddr--;
> + /* Fall through */
>
I think it would be clearer if you would drop the blank lines.
> case CSR_LEFT_1:
> *vaddr = (dregs->bpack_hi & 0xff00) >> 8;
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists