linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] sched/core: Don't use dying mm as active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190729154419.GJ31398@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:44:19 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/core: Don't use dying mm as active_mm of
 kthreads

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:28:04AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 17:03 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > The 'sad' part is that x86 already switches to init_mm on idle and we
> > only keep the active_mm around for 'stupid'.
> 
> Wait, where do we do that?

drivers/idle/intel_idle.c:              leave_mm(cpu);
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:  acpi_unlazy_tlb(smp_processor_id());

> > Rik and Andy were working on getting that 'fixed' a while ago, not
> > sure
> > where that went.
> 
> My lazy TLB stuff got merged last year. 

Yes, but we never got around to getting rid of active_mm for x86, right?