[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190729160723.am3cs5pasi22pibi@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:07:23 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mripard@...nel.org, wens@...e.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] pwm: sun4i: Add support for H6 PWM
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:55:52PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> Dne ponedeljek, 29. julij 2019 ob 08:40:30 CEST je Uwe Kleine-König
> napisal(a):
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 08:40:43PM +0200, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> > > Now that sun4i PWM driver supports deasserting reset line and enabling
> > > bus clock, support for H6 PWM can be added.
> > >
> > > Note that while H6 PWM has two channels, only first one is wired to
> > > output pin. Second channel is used as a clock source to companion AC200
> > > chip which is bundled into same package.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> > > index 7d3ac3f2dc3f..9e0eca79ff88 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> > > @@ -331,6 +331,13 @@ static const struct sun4i_pwm_data
> > > sun4i_pwm_single_bypass = {>
> > > .npwm = 1,
> > >
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static const struct sun4i_pwm_data sun50i_pwm_dual_bypass_clk_rst = {
> > > + .has_bus_clock = true,
> > > + .has_prescaler_bypass = true,
> > > + .has_reset = true,
> > > + .npwm = 2,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >
> > > static const struct of_device_id sun4i_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-pwm",
> > >
> > > @@ -347,6 +354,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id sun4i_pwm_dt_ids[] =
> > > {
> > >
> > > }, {
> > >
> > > .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-pwm",
> > > .data = &sun4i_pwm_single_bypass,
> > >
> > > + }, {
> > > + .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6-pwm",
> > > + .data = &sun50i_pwm_dual_bypass_clk_rst,
> >
> > If you follow my suggestion for the two previous patches, you can just
> > use:
> >
> > compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6-pwm", "allwinner,sun5i-a10s-pwm";
> >
> > and drop this patch.
>
> Maxime found out that it's not compatible with A10s due to difference in bypass
> bit, but yes, I know what you mean.
>
> Since H6 requires reset line and bus clock to be specified, it's not compatible
> from DT binding side. New yaml based binding must somehow know that in order
> to be able to validate DT node, so it needs standalone compatible. However,
> depending on conclusions of other discussions, this new compatible can be
> associated with already available quirks structure or have it's own.
I cannot follow. You should be able to specify in the binding that the
reset line and bus clock is optional. Then allwinner,sun50i-h6-pwm
without a reset line and bus clock also verifies, but this doesn't
really hurt (and who knows, maybe the next allwinner chip needs exactly
this).
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists