linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/20] timestamp_truncate: Replace users of timespec64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABeXuvqgaxDSR8N_D1Tdw06g_5PGinZS--6nx-bPtAWP4v+mwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:26:22 -0700
From:   Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To:     OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, anton@...era.com,
        Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        yuchao0@...wei.com,
        "Linux F2FS DEV, Mailing List" 
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] timestamp_truncate: Replace users of timespec64_trunc

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:27 AM OGAWA Hirofumi
<hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
>
> Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/fs/fat/misc.c b/fs/fat/misc.c
> > index 1e08bd54c5fb..53bb7c6bf993 100644
> > --- a/fs/fat/misc.c
> > +++ b/fs/fat/misc.c
> > @@ -307,8 +307,9 @@ int fat_truncate_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *now, int flags)
> >               inode->i_atime = (struct timespec64){ seconds, 0 };
> >       }
> >       if (flags & S_CTIME) {
> > -             if (sbi->options.isvfat)
> > -                     inode->i_ctime = timespec64_trunc(*now, 10000000);
> > +             if (sbi->options.isvfat) {
> > +                     inode->i_ctime = timestamp_truncate(*now, inode);
> > +             }
> >               else
> >                       inode->i_ctime = fat_timespec64_trunc_2secs(*now);
> >       }
>
> Looks like broken. It changed to sb->s_time_gran from 10000000, and
> changed coding style.

This is using a new api: timestamp_truncate(). granularity is gotten
by inode->sb->s_time_gran. See Patch [2/20]:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/29/1853

So this is not broken if fat is filling in the right granularity in the sb.

-Deepa