linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] psi: do not require setsched permission from the trigger creator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:44:51 -0700
From:   Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, lizefan@...wei.com,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Nick Kralevich <nnk@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] psi: do not require setsched permission from the
 trigger creator

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:11 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 06:33:10PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > When a process creates a new trigger by writing into /proc/pressure/*
> > files, permissions to write such a file should be used to determine whether
> > the process is allowed to do so or not. Current implementation would also
> > require such a process to have setsched capability. Setting of psi trigger
> > thread's scheduling policy is an implementation detail and should not be
> > exposed to the user level. Remove the permission check by using _nocheck
> > version of the function.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Nick Kralevich <nnk@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/psi.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
> > index 7acc632c3b82..ed9a1d573cb1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
> > @@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@ struct psi_trigger *psi_trigger_create(struct psi_group *group,
> >                       mutex_unlock(&group->trigger_lock);
> >                       return ERR_CAST(kworker);
> >               }
> > -             sched_setscheduler(kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
> > +             sched_setscheduler_nocheck(kworker->task, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
>
> ARGGH, wtf is there a FIFO-99!! thread here at all !?

We need psi poll_kworker to be an rt-priority thread so that psi
notifications are delivered to the userspace without delay even when
the CPUs are very congested. Otherwise it's easy to delay psi
notifications by running a simple CPU hogger executing "chrt -f 50 dd
if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null". Because these notifications are
time-critical for reacting to memory shortages we can't allow for such
delays.
Notice that this kworker is created only if userspace creates a psi
trigger. So unless you are using psi triggers you will never see this
kthread created.

> >               kthread_init_delayed_work(&group->poll_work,
> >                               psi_poll_work);
> >               rcu_assign_pointer(group->poll_kworker, kworker);
> > --
> > 2.22.0.709.g102302147b-goog
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@...roid.com.
>