[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190730181916.GJ250418@google.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:19:16 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: A few fixes for veyron-{fievel,tiger}
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:01:42AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:34 AM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > @@ -130,12 +138,13 @@
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> > regulator-name = "vdd18_lcdt";
> > regulator-state-mem {
> > - regulator-on-in-suspend;
> > + regulator-off-in-suspend;
> > regulator-suspend-microvolt = <1800000>;
>
> Please remove "regulator-suspend-microvolt = <1800000>;" which doesn't
> make sense once you have "regulator-off-in-suspend".
will remove all instances
> > };
> > };
> >
> > - /* This is not a pwren anymore, but the real power supply,
> > + /*
> > + * This is not a pwren anymore, but the real power supply,
> > * vdd10_lcd for HDMI_AVDD_1V0
> > */
> > vdd10_lcd: LDO_REG7 {
> > @@ -145,7 +154,7 @@
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
> > regulator-name = "vdd10_lcd";
> > regulator-state-mem {
> > - regulator-on-in-suspend;
> > + regulator-off-in-suspend;
> > regulator-suspend-microvolt = <1000000>;
>
> Please remove "regulator-suspend-microvolt = <1000000>;" which doesn't
> make sense once you have "regulator-off-in-suspend".
>
>
> > };
> >
> > @@ -159,7 +168,7 @@
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > regulator-name = "vcc33_ccd";
> > regulator-state-mem {
> > - regulator-on-in-suspend;
> > + regulator-off-in-suspend;
> > regulator-suspend-microvolt = <3300000>;
>
> Please remove "regulator-suspend-microvolt = <3300000>;" which doesn't
> make sense once you have "regulator-off-in-suspend".
>
>
> Other than those things, this patch looks good to me and feel free to
> add my Reviewed-by.
Thanks for your review!
> NOTE: when I tried applying this to my tree git
> complained and I had to apply manually. Could you try sending this
> patch atop Heiko's for-next tree? The yell I got:
>
> error: sha1 information is lacking or useless
> (arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-veyron-fievel.dts).
> error: could not build fake ancestor
Ok, I'll rebase v2 on Heiko's for-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists