lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:56:11 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] docs: rcu: Correct links referring to titles

Em Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:10:29 -0400
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org> escreveu:

> Mauro's auto conversion broken these links, fix them.

They actually worked here with the Sphinx I used, but yeah, the way it
is is a way cleaner.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> ---
>  .../Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst              | 17 ++--
>  .../RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst  | 90 ++++++++-----------
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst
> index 1011b5db1b3d..248b1222f918 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst
> @@ -230,15 +230,14 @@ Tree RCU Grace Period Memory Ordering Components
>  Tree RCU's grace-period memory-ordering guarantee is provided by a
>  number of RCU components:
>  
> -#. `Callback Registry <#Callback%20Registry>`__
> -#. `Grace-Period Initialization <#Grace-Period%20Initialization>`__
> -#. `Self-Reported Quiescent
> -   States <#Self-Reported%20Quiescent%20States>`__
> -#. `Dynamic Tick Interface <#Dynamic%20Tick%20Interface>`__
> -#. `CPU-Hotplug Interface <#CPU-Hotplug%20Interface>`__
> -#. `Forcing Quiescent States <Forcing%20Quiescent%20States>`__
> -#. `Grace-Period Cleanup <Grace-Period%20Cleanup>`__
> -#. `Callback Invocation <Callback%20Invocation>`__
> +#. `Callback Registry`_
> +#. `Grace-Period Initialization`_
> +#. `Self-Reported Quiescent States`_
> +#. `Dynamic Tick Interface`_
> +#. `CPU-Hotplug Interface`_
> +#. `Forcing Quiescent States`_
> +#. `Grace-Period Cleanup`_
> +#. `Callback Invocation`_
>  
>  Each of the following section looks at the corresponding component in
>  detail.
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> index 876e0038bb58..a33b5fb331b4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> @@ -36,16 +36,14 @@ technologies in interesting new ways.
>  All that aside, here are the categories of currently known RCU
>  requirements:
>  
> -#. `Fundamental Requirements <#Fundamental%20Requirements>`__
> -#. `Fundamental Non-Requirements <#Fundamental%20Non-Requirements>`__
> -#. `Parallelism Facts of Life <#Parallelism%20Facts%20of%20Life>`__
> -#. `Quality-of-Implementation
> -   Requirements <#Quality-of-Implementation%20Requirements>`__
> -#. `Linux Kernel Complications <#Linux%20Kernel%20Complications>`__
> -#. `Software-Engineering
> -   Requirements <#Software-Engineering%20Requirements>`__
> -#. `Other RCU Flavors <#Other%20RCU%20Flavors>`__
> -#. `Possible Future Changes <#Possible%20Future%20Changes>`__
> +#. `Fundamental Requirements`_
> +#. `Fundamental Non-Requirements`_
> +#. `Parallelism Facts of Life`_
> +#. `Quality-of-Implementation Requirements`_
> +#. `Linux Kernel Complications`_
> +#. `Software-Engineering Requirements`_
> +#. `Other RCU Flavors`_
> +#. `Possible Future Changes`_
>  
>  This is followed by a `summary <#Summary>`__, however, the answers to
>  each quick quiz immediately follows the quiz. Select the big white space
> @@ -57,13 +55,11 @@ Fundamental Requirements
>  RCU's fundamental requirements are the closest thing RCU has to hard
>  mathematical requirements. These are:
>  
> -#. `Grace-Period Guarantee <#Grace-Period%20Guarantee>`__
> -#. `Publish-Subscribe Guarantee <#Publish-Subscribe%20Guarantee>`__
> -#. `Memory-Barrier Guarantees <#Memory-Barrier%20Guarantees>`__
> -#. `RCU Primitives Guaranteed to Execute
> -   Unconditionally <#RCU%20Primitives%20Guaranteed%20to%20Execute%20Unconditionally>`__
> -#. `Guaranteed Read-to-Write
> -   Upgrade <#Guaranteed%20Read-to-Write%20Upgrade>`__
> +#. `Grace-Period Guarantee`_
> +#. `Publish/Subscribe Guarantee`_
> +#. `Memory-Barrier Guarantees`_
> +#. `RCU Primitives Guaranteed to Execute Unconditionally`_
> +#. `Guaranteed Read-to-Write Upgrade`_
>  
>  Grace-Period Guarantee
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> @@ -689,16 +685,11 @@ infinitely long, however, the following sections list a few
>  non-guarantees that have caused confusion. Except where otherwise noted,
>  these non-guarantees were premeditated.
>  
> -#. `Readers Impose Minimal
> -   Ordering <#Readers%20Impose%20Minimal%20Ordering>`__
> -#. `Readers Do Not Exclude
> -   Updaters <#Readers%20Do%20Not%20Exclude%20Updaters>`__
> -#. `Updaters Only Wait For Old
> -   Readers <#Updaters%20Only%20Wait%20For%20Old%20Readers>`__
> -#. `Grace Periods Don't Partition Read-Side Critical
> -   Sections <#Grace%20Periods%20Don't%20Partition%20Read-Side%20Critical%20Sections>`__
> -#. `Read-Side Critical Sections Don't Partition Grace
> -   Periods <#Read-Side%20Critical%20Sections%20Don't%20Partition%20Grace%20Periods>`__
> +#. `Readers Impose Minimal Ordering`_
> +#. `Readers Do Not Exclude Updaters`_
> +#. `Updaters Only Wait For Old Readers`_
> +#. `Grace Periods Don't Partition Read-Side Critical Sections`_
> +#. `Read-Side Critical Sections Don't Partition Grace Periods`_
>  
>  Readers Impose Minimal Ordering
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> @@ -1056,11 +1047,11 @@ it would likely be subject to limitations that would make it
>  inappropriate for industrial-strength production use. Classes of
>  quality-of-implementation requirements are as follows:
>  
> -#. `Specialization <#Specialization>`__
> -#. `Performance and Scalability <#Performance%20and%20Scalability>`__
> -#. `Forward Progress <#Forward%20Progress>`__
> -#. `Composability <#Composability>`__
> -#. `Corner Cases <#Corner%20Cases>`__
> +#. `Specialization`_
> +#. `Performance and Scalability`_
> +#. `Forward Progress`_
> +#. `Composability`_
> +#. `Corner Cases`_
>  
>  These classes is covered in the following sections.
>  
> @@ -1692,21 +1683,18 @@ The Linux kernel provides an interesting environment for all kinds of
>  software, including RCU. Some of the relevant points of interest are as
>  follows:
>  
> -#. `Configuration <#Configuration>`__.
> -#. `Firmware Interface <#Firmware%20Interface>`__.
> -#. `Early Boot <#Early%20Boot>`__.
> -#. `Interrupts and non-maskable interrupts
> -   (NMIs) <#Interrupts%20and%20NMIs>`__.
> -#. `Loadable Modules <#Loadable%20Modules>`__.
> -#. `Hotplug CPU <#Hotplug%20CPU>`__.
> -#. `Scheduler and RCU <#Scheduler%20and%20RCU>`__.
> -#. `Tracing and RCU <#Tracing%20and%20RCU>`__.
> -#. `Energy Efficiency <#Energy%20Efficiency>`__.
> -#. `Scheduling-Clock Interrupts and
> -   RCU <#Scheduling-Clock%20Interrupts%20and%20RCU>`__.
> -#. `Memory Efficiency <#Memory%20Efficiency>`__.
> -#. `Performance, Scalability, Response Time, and
> -   Reliability <#Performance,%20Scalability,%20Response%20Time,%20and%20Reliability>`__.
> +#. `Configuration`_
> +#. `Firmware Interface`_
> +#. `Early Boot`_
> +#. `Interrupts and NMIs`_
> +#. `Loadable Modules`_
> +#. `Hotplug CPU`_
> +#. `Scheduler and RCU`_
> +#. `Tracing and RCU`_
> +#. `Energy Efficiency`_
> +#. `Scheduling-Clock Interrupts and RCU`_
> +#. `Memory Efficiency`_
> +#. `Performance, Scalability, Response Time, and Reliability`_
>  
>  This list is probably incomplete, but it does give a feel for the most
>  notable Linux-kernel complications. Each of the following sections
> @@ -2344,10 +2332,10 @@ implementations, non-preemptible and preemptible. The other four flavors
>  are listed below, with requirements for each described in a separate
>  section.
>  
> -#. `Bottom-Half Flavor (Historical) <#Bottom-Half%20Flavor>`__
> -#. `Sched Flavor (Historical) <#Sched%20Flavor>`__
> -#. `Sleepable RCU <#Sleepable%20RCU>`__
> -#. `Tasks RCU <#Tasks%20RCU>`__
> +#. `Bottom-Half Flavor (Historical)`_
> +#. `Sched Flavor (Historical)`_
> +#. `Sleepable RCU`_
> +#. `Tasks RCU`_
>  
>  Bottom-Half Flavor (Historical)
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sounds a lot better to me.

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>


Thanks,
Mauro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ