[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1bcb2fc7-f64b-282c-36ab-eda9ccb4601d@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:05:59 +0800
From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>, josef@...icpanda.com
Cc: kjlu@....edu, smccaman@....edu, secalert@...hat.com,
emamd001@....edu, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, nbd@...er.debian.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nbd_genl_status: null check for nla_nest_start
On 7/30/19 12:42 AM, Navid Emamdoost wrote:
> nla_nest_start may fail and return NULL. The check is inserted, and
> errno is selected based on other call sites within the same source code.
> Update: removed extra new line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/nbd.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> index 9bcde2325893..2410812d1e82 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> @@ -2149,6 +2149,11 @@ static int nbd_genl_status(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> }
>
> dev_list = nla_nest_start_noflag(reply, NBD_ATTR_DEVICE_LIST);
> + if (!dev_list) {
> + ret = -EMSGSIZE;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> if (index == -1) {
> ret = idr_for_each(&nbd_index_idr, &status_cb, reply);
> if (ret) {
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists