[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190730014650.GA31309@embeddedor>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:46:50 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: riowd: Mark expected switch fall-through
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: sparc64):
drivers/watchdog/riowd.c: In function ‘riowd_ioctl’:
drivers/watchdog/riowd.c:136:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
riowd_writereg(p, riowd_timeout, WDTO_INDEX);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/watchdog/riowd.c:139:2: note: here
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
^~~~
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/riowd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/riowd.c b/drivers/watchdog/riowd.c
index 41a2a11535a6..b35f7be20c00 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/riowd.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/riowd.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static long riowd_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
return -EINVAL;
riowd_timeout = (new_margin + 59) / 60;
riowd_writereg(p, riowd_timeout, WDTO_INDEX);
- /* Fall */
+ /* Fall through */
case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
return put_user(riowd_timeout * 60, (int __user *)argp);
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists