[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d0hsapwr.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 17:27:00 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
y2038@...ts.linaro.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com, anton@...era.com,
dedekind1@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hch@....de,
jaegeuk@...nel.org, jlbec@...lplan.org, richard@....at,
tj@...nel.org, yuchao0@...wei.com,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/20] timestamp_truncate: Replace users of
timespec64_trunc
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com> writes:
> diff --git a/fs/fat/misc.c b/fs/fat/misc.c
> index 1e08bd54c5fb..53bb7c6bf993 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/misc.c
> +++ b/fs/fat/misc.c
> @@ -307,8 +307,9 @@ int fat_truncate_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *now, int flags)
> inode->i_atime = (struct timespec64){ seconds, 0 };
> }
> if (flags & S_CTIME) {
> - if (sbi->options.isvfat)
> - inode->i_ctime = timespec64_trunc(*now, 10000000);
> + if (sbi->options.isvfat) {
> + inode->i_ctime = timestamp_truncate(*now, inode);
> + }
> else
> inode->i_ctime = fat_timespec64_trunc_2secs(*now);
> }
Looks like broken. It changed to sb->s_time_gran from 10000000, and
changed coding style.
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists