[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ebde80e-e8a9-6b7b-52ea-656b9a9e5e5b@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:00:07 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Radim K <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/16] RISC-V: KVM: Implement stage2 page table
programming
On 29/07/19 13:57, Anup Patel wrote:
> This patch implements all required functions for programming
> the stage2 page table for each Guest/VM.
>
> At high-level, the flow of stage2 related functions is similar
> from KVM ARM/ARM64 implementation but the stage2 page table
> format is quite different for KVM RISC-V.
FWIW I very much prefer KVM x86's recursive implementation of the MMU to
the hardcoding of pgd/pmd/pte. I am not asking you to rewrite it, but
I'll mention it because I noticed that you do not support 48-bit guest
physical addresses.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists