[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5D3FE6B4.6040602@zoho.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:41:56 +0800
From: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...o.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
paul.burton@...s.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com,
jason@...edaemon.net, marc.zyngier@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v4] irqchip: Ingenic: Change interrupt handling form
cascade to chained_irq.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your suggestion, and after receiving Marc's comments,
if this patch can be continued, I'll use for_each_set_bit() to simplify
code in v5.
On 2019年07月30日 01:19, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi Zhou,
>
>
>
> Le dim. 28 juil. 2019 à 13:34, Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...o.com> a
> écrit :
>> The interrupt handling method is changed from old-style cascade to
>> chained_irq which is more appropriate. Also, it can process the
>> corner situation that more than one irq is coming to a single
>> chip at the same time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...o.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c | 37
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
>> index f126255..49f7685 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> /*
>> * Copyright (C) 2009-2010, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
>> - * JZ4740 platform IRQ support
>> + * Ingenic XBurst platform IRQ support
>> */
>>
>> #include <linux/errno.h>
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> #include <linux/ioport.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip.h>
>> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip/ingenic.h>
>> #include <linux/of_address.h>
>> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>> @@ -32,22 +33,34 @@ struct ingenic_intc_data {
>> #define JZ_REG_INTC_PENDING 0x10
>> #define CHIP_SIZE 0x20
>>
>> -static irqreturn_t intc_cascade(int irq, void *data)
>> +static void ingenic_chained_handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> {
>> - struct ingenic_intc_data *intc = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
>> - uint32_t irq_reg;
>> + struct ingenic_intc_data *intc = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
>> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
>> + bool have_irq = false;
>> + uint32_t pending;
>> unsigned i;
>>
>> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>> for (i = 0; i < intc->num_chips; i++) {
>> - irq_reg = readl(intc->base + (i * CHIP_SIZE) +
>> + pending = readl(intc->base + (i * CHIP_SIZE) +
>> JZ_REG_INTC_PENDING);
>> - if (!irq_reg)
>> + if (!pending)
>> continue;
>>
>> - generic_handle_irq(__fls(irq_reg) + (i * 32) +
>> JZ4740_IRQ_BASE);
>> + have_irq = true;
>> + while (pending) {
>> + int bit = __fls(pending);
>
> Use the for_each_set_bit() macro here, that will be simpler.
>
>
>> +
>> + generic_handle_irq(bit + (i * 32) + JZ4740_IRQ_BASE);
>> + pending &= ~BIT(bit);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> - return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> + if (!have_irq)
>> + spurious_interrupt();
>> +
>> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
>> }
>>
>> static void intc_irq_set_mask(struct irq_chip_generic *gc, uint32_t
>> mask)
>> @@ -70,11 +83,6 @@ void ingenic_intc_irq_resume(struct irq_data *data)
>> intc_irq_set_mask(gc, gc->mask_cache);
>> }
>>
>> -static struct irqaction intc_cascade_action = {
>> - .handler = intc_cascade,
>> - .name = "SoC intc cascade interrupt",
>> -};
>> -
>> static int __init ingenic_intc_of_init(struct device_node *node,
>> unsigned num_chips)
>> {
>> @@ -139,7 +147,8 @@ static int __init ingenic_intc_of_init(struct
>> device_node *node,
>> if (!domain)
>> pr_warn("unable to register IRQ domain\n");
>>
>> - setup_irq(parent_irq, &intc_cascade_action);
>> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(parent_irq,
>> + ingenic_chained_handle_irq, intc);
>> return 0;
>>
>> out_unmap_irq:
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists