[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1767168.ICNatdIUZt@kreacher>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:00:43 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/8] ACPI: PM: s2idle: Switch EC over to polling during "noirq" suspend
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Since the ACPI SCI is set up for system wakeup before the "noirq"
suspend of devices, it is better to make suspend-to-idle follow
suspend-to-RAM (S3) and switch over the EC to polling during "noirq"
suspend (and back to interrupt-based flow during "noirq" resume).
The frequency of spurious wakeup interrupts from the EC may be
reduced this way.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
New in v2.
---
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -1958,8 +1958,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_suspend_noirq(struct
ec->reference_count >= 1)
acpi_set_gpe(NULL, ec->gpe, ACPI_GPE_DISABLE);
- if (acpi_sleep_no_ec_events())
- acpi_ec_enter_noirq(ec);
+ acpi_ec_enter_noirq(ec);
return 0;
}
@@ -1968,8 +1967,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_resume_noirq(struct d
{
struct acpi_ec *ec = acpi_driver_data(to_acpi_device(dev));
- if (acpi_sleep_no_ec_events())
- acpi_ec_leave_noirq(ec);
+ acpi_ec_leave_noirq(ec);
if (ec_no_wakeup && test_bit(EC_FLAGS_STARTED, &ec->flags) &&
ec->reference_count >= 1)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists