| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:57:21 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Enable dirty_log_test on s390x
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:01:12PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> To run the dirty_log_test on s390x, we have to make sure that we
> access the dirty log bitmap with little endian byte ordering and
> we have to properly align the memslot of the guest.
> Also all dirty bits of a segment are set once on s390x when one
> of the pages of a segment are written to for the first time, so
> we have to make sure that we touch all pages during the first
> iteration to keep the test in sync here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> index ba7849751989..ac7e63e00fee 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += dirty_log_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_aarch64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
>
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += s390x/sync_regs_test
> +TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += dirty_log_test
> TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390x += kvm_create_max_vcpus
>
> TEST_GEN_PROGS += $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_$(UNAME_M))
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c
> index ceb52b952637..7a1223ad0ff3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c
> @@ -26,9 +26,22 @@
> /* The memory slot index to track dirty pages */
> #define TEST_MEM_SLOT_INDEX 1
>
> +#ifdef __s390x__
> +
> +/*
> + * On s390x, the ELF program is sometimes linked at 0x80000000, so we can
> + * not use 0x40000000 here without overlapping into that region. Thus let's
> + * use 0xc0000000 as base address there instead.
> + */
> +#define DEFAULT_GUEST_TEST_MEM 0xc0000000
I think both x86 and aarch64 should be ok with this offset. If testing
proves it does, then we can just change it for all architecture.
> +
> +#else
> +
> /* Default guest test memory offset, 1G */
> #define DEFAULT_GUEST_TEST_MEM 0x40000000
>
> +#endif
> +
> /* How many pages to dirty for each guest loop */
> #define TEST_PAGES_PER_LOOP 1024
>
> @@ -38,6 +51,27 @@
> /* Interval for each host loop (ms) */
> #define TEST_HOST_LOOP_INTERVAL 10UL
>
> +/* Dirty bitmaps are always little endian, so we need to swap on big endian */
> +#if defined(__s390x__)
> +# define BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE ((BITS_PER_LONG-1) & ~0x7)
> +# define test_bit_le(nr, addr) \
> + test_bit((nr) ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr)
> +# define set_bit_le(nr, addr) \
> + set_bit((nr) ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr)
> +# define clear_bit_le(nr, addr) \
> + clear_bit((nr) ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr)
> +# define test_and_set_bit_le(nr, addr) \
> + test_and_set_bit((nr) ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr)
> +# define test_and_clear_bit_le(nr, addr) \
> + test_and_clear_bit((nr) ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr)
> +#else
> +# define test_bit_le test_bit
> +# define set_bit_le set_bit
> +# define clear_bit_le clear_bit
> +# define test_and_set_bit_le test_and_set_bit
> +# define test_and_clear_bit_le test_and_clear_bit
> +#endif
nit: does the formatting above look right after applying the patch?
> +
> /*
> * Guest/Host shared variables. Ensure addr_gva2hva() and/or
> * sync_global_to/from_guest() are used when accessing from
> @@ -69,11 +103,25 @@ static uint64_t guest_test_virt_mem = DEFAULT_GUEST_TEST_MEM;
> */
> static void guest_code(void)
> {
> + uint64_t addr;
> int i;
>
> +#ifdef __s390x__
> + /*
> + * On s390x, all pages of a 1M segment are initially marked as dirty
> + * when a page of the segment is written to for the very first time.
> + * To compensate this specialty in this test, we need to touch all
> + * pages during the first iteration.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < guest_num_pages; i++) {
> + addr = guest_test_virt_mem + i * guest_page_size;
> + *(uint64_t *)addr = READ_ONCE(iteration);
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> while (true) {
> for (i = 0; i < TEST_PAGES_PER_LOOP; i++) {
> - uint64_t addr = guest_test_virt_mem;
> + addr = guest_test_virt_mem;
> addr += (READ_ONCE(random_array[i]) % guest_num_pages)
> * guest_page_size;
> addr &= ~(host_page_size - 1);
> @@ -158,15 +206,15 @@ static void vm_dirty_log_verify(unsigned long *bmap)
> value_ptr = host_test_mem + page * host_page_size;
>
> /* If this is a special page that we were tracking... */
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(page, host_bmap_track)) {
> + if (test_and_clear_bit_le(page, host_bmap_track)) {
> host_track_next_count++;
> - TEST_ASSERT(test_bit(page, bmap),
> + TEST_ASSERT(test_bit_le(page, bmap),
> "Page %"PRIu64" should have its dirty bit "
> "set in this iteration but it is missing",
> page);
> }
>
> - if (test_bit(page, bmap)) {
> + if (test_bit_le(page, bmap)) {
> host_dirty_count++;
> /*
> * If the bit is set, the value written onto
> @@ -209,7 +257,7 @@ static void vm_dirty_log_verify(unsigned long *bmap)
> * should report its dirtyness in the
> * next run
> */
> - set_bit(page, host_bmap_track);
> + set_bit_le(page, host_bmap_track);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -293,6 +341,10 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, unsigned long iterations,
> * case where the size is not aligned to 64 pages.
> */
> guest_num_pages = (1ul << (30 - guest_page_shift)) + 16;
> +#ifdef __s390x__
> + /* Round up to multiple of 1M (segment size) */
> + guest_num_pages = (guest_num_pages + 0xff) & ~0xffUL;
We could maybe do this for all architectures as well.
> +#endif
> host_page_size = getpagesize();
> host_num_pages = (guest_num_pages * guest_page_size) / host_page_size +
> !!((guest_num_pages * guest_page_size) % host_page_size);
> @@ -304,6 +356,11 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, unsigned long iterations,
> guest_test_phys_mem = phys_offset;
> }
>
> +#ifdef __s390x__
> + /* Align to 1M (segment size) */
> + guest_test_phys_mem &= ~((1 << 20) - 1);
and this
> +#endif
> +
> DEBUG("guest physical test memory offset: 0x%lx\n", guest_test_phys_mem);
>
> bmap = bitmap_alloc(host_num_pages);
> @@ -454,6 +511,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> vm_guest_mode_params_init(VM_MODE_P48V48_64K, true, true);
> }
> #endif
> +#ifdef __s390x__
> + vm_guest_mode_params_init(VM_MODE_P40V48_4K, true, true);
> +#endif
>
> while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hi:I:p:m:")) != -1) {
> switch (opt) {
> --
> 2.21.0
>
Thanks,
drew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists