[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1i3fV_qzx_q6nucqh4aNLi0a+iwvcis9BpYfMOkoew8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:24:43 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: remove Nuvoton w90x900/nuc900 platform?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:09 PM Mail Delivery Subsystem
<mailer-daemon@...glemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:09 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > As the mach-netx and mach-8695 platforms are being removed now,
> > I wonder whether we should do the same with w90x00: Here is what
> > I found after looking at the git history and external material for it.
> >
> > - The supported chips (nuc910/950/960) are no longer marketed
> > by the manufacturer
> >
> > - Newer chips from the same family (nuc97x, nuc980, n329x)
> > that are still marketed have Linux BSPs but those were never
> > submitted for upstream inclusion.
> >
> > - Wan ZongShun is listed as maintainer, but the last patch he wrote
> > was in 2011.
> >
> > - All patches to w90x900 platform specific files afterwards
> > are cleanups that were apparently done without access to
> > test hardware.
> >
> > - The http://www.mcuos.com/ website listed in the MAINTAINERS
> > file is no longer reachable.
>
> Recipient inbox full
>
> Your message couldn't be delivered to mcuos.com@...il.com. Their inbox is full, or it's getting too much mail right now.
Yes, that too.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists