lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1i3fV_qzx_q6nucqh4aNLi0a+iwvcis9BpYfMOkoew8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:24:43 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
        Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
        Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
        Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
        Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
        Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
        OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: remove Nuvoton w90x900/nuc900 platform?

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:09 PM Mail Delivery Subsystem
<mailer-daemon@...glemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:09 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > As the mach-netx and mach-8695 platforms are being removed now,
> > I wonder whether we should do the same with w90x00: Here is what
> > I found after looking at the git history and external material for it.
> >
> >     - The supported chips (nuc910/950/960) are no longer marketed
> >       by the manufacturer
> >
> >     - Newer chips from the same family (nuc97x, nuc980, n329x)
> >       that are still marketed have Linux BSPs but those were never
> >       submitted for upstream inclusion.
> >
> >     - Wan ZongShun is listed as maintainer, but the last patch he wrote
> >       was in 2011.
> >
> >     - All patches to w90x900 platform specific files afterwards
> >       are cleanups that were apparently done without access to
> >       test hardware.
> >
> >     - The http://www.mcuos.com/ website listed in the MAINTAINERS
> >        file is no longer reachable.
>
> Recipient inbox full
>
> Your message couldn't be delivered to mcuos.com@...il.com. Their inbox is full, or it's getting too much mail right now.

Yes, that too.

        Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ