lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:21:54 +0900 From: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com> To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>, Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: uniphier: Separate modem group from UART ctsrts group Hello, On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 22:45:01 +0900 <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:29 PM Kunihiko Hayashi > <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com> wrote: > > > > It depends on the board implementation whether to have each pins of > > CTS/RTS, and others for modem. So it is necessary to divide current > > uart_ctsrts group into uart_ctsrts and uart_modem groups. > > > > Since the number of implemented pins for modem differs depending > > on SoC, each uart_modem group also has a different number of pins. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com> > > --- > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c b/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c > > index 414ff3a..d1ed5b7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c > > @@ -780,8 +780,10 @@ static const unsigned system_bus_cs5_pins[] = {55}; > > static const int system_bus_cs5_muxvals[] = {6}; > > static const unsigned uart0_pins[] = {135, 136}; > > static const int uart0_muxvals[] = {3, 3}; > > -static const unsigned uart0_ctsrts_pins[] = {137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 124}; > > -static const int uart0_ctsrts_muxvals[] = {3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3}; > > +static const unsigned uart0_ctsrts_pins[] = {137, 139}; > > +static const int uart0_ctsrts_muxvals[] = {3, 3}; > > +static const unsigned uart0_modem_pins[] = {138, 140, 141, 124}; > > Please sort this array > while you are here. Thank you for pointing out. I'll sort it in v2. > > Otherwise, looks good to me. > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada --- Best Regards, Kunihiko Hayashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists