lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:21:54 +0900
From:   Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...aro.org>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: uniphier: Separate modem group from UART ctsrts group

Hello,

On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 22:45:01 +0900 <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:29 PM Kunihiko Hayashi
> <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com> wrote:
> >
> > It depends on the board implementation whether to have each pins of
> > CTS/RTS, and others for modem. So it is necessary to divide current
> > uart_ctsrts group into uart_ctsrts and uart_modem groups.
> >
> > Since the number of implemented pins for modem differs depending
> > on SoC, each uart_modem group also has a different number of pins.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
> > ---
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c b/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c
> > index 414ff3a..d1ed5b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/uniphier/pinctrl-uniphier-ld6b.c
> > @@ -780,8 +780,10 @@ static const unsigned system_bus_cs5_pins[] = {55};
> >  static const int system_bus_cs5_muxvals[] = {6};
> >  static const unsigned uart0_pins[] = {135, 136};
> >  static const int uart0_muxvals[] = {3, 3};
> > -static const unsigned uart0_ctsrts_pins[] = {137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 124};
> > -static const int uart0_ctsrts_muxvals[] = {3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3};
> > +static const unsigned uart0_ctsrts_pins[] = {137, 139};
> > +static const int uart0_ctsrts_muxvals[] = {3, 3};
> > +static const unsigned uart0_modem_pins[] = {138, 140, 141, 124};
> 
> Please sort this array
> while you are here.

Thank you for pointing out.
I'll sort it in v2.

> 
> Otherwise, looks good to me.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada

---
Best Regards,
Kunihiko Hayashi


Powered by blists - more mailing lists