[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8cb2ac13-3009-2117-d55f-6f1126b690e4@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:36:39 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: Introducing support for Page
Pool
On 30/07/2019 10:39, Jose Abreu wrote:
...
> I looked at netsec implementation and I noticed that we are syncing the
> old buffer for device instead of the new one. netsec syncs the buffer
> for device immediately after the allocation which may be what we have to
> do. Maybe the attached patch can make things work for you ?
Great! This one works. I have booted this several times and I am no
longer seeing any issues. Thanks for figuring this out!
Feel free to add my ...
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists