[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190730144023.GA6683@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:40:23 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] nouveau: pass struct nouveau_svmm to
nouveau_range_fault
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:14:58PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I have a patch deleting hmm->mm, so using svmm seems cleaner churn
> here, we could defer and I can fold this into that patch?
Sounds good. If I don't need to resend feel fee to fold it, otherwise
I'll fix it up.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists