linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/macintosh/smu.c: Mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190731004153.6c6198fa@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:41:53 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linux kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/macintosh/smu.c: Mark expected switch
 fall-through

Hi Michael,

On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:28:55 +1000 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Why do we think it's an expected fall through? I can't really convince
> myself from the surrounding code that it's definitely intentional.

Its been that way since this code was introduced by commit

  0365ba7fb1fa ("[PATCH] ppc64: SMU driver update & i2c support")

in 2005 ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped