linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOMZO5Ak7QFzEM8Qt5XAZBa1CB602fygK+FBDK2iTvxWA4y+oA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:40:57 -0300
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:     Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Cc:     Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@....com>,
        Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/bridge: Add NWL MIPI DSI host controller support

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 1:40 PM Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net> wrote:

> > Yes, I understood the idea, but this would print:
> >
> > ensabling or dissabling :-)
>
> No, it wouldn't. That extra "s" is part of "%s", e.g. part of format specifier.

Ops, you are right. Sorry about that!