linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] watchdog: pc87413: Rewriting of pc87413

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907302202420.106416@mbalantz-desktop>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 22:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Mark Balantzyan <mbalant3@...il.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
cc:     Mark Balantzyan <mbalant3@...il.com>, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        andrianov@...ras.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: pc87413: Rewriting of pc87413_wdt driver to
 use watchdog subsystem

Hi all, Guenter,

Thank you for your email. Unfortunately, on my end, the indentation is
straight and perhaps through protocol transfer there was stray
modification.

I've made the other changes as indicated that I'll submit in a v2 patch 
shortly. Is 'v2' permissible to include in the title in this case? Not 
sure, but this will BE a modification...in that case I should have been 
v-ing my patches since.

No, the compiler did not complain about no 'return ret' as part of the 
label code block. The function does 'return 0;' at the end, by default.

Thanks + regards,
Mark