[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190731193517.237136-8-sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:35:15 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] clk: sprd: Don't reference clk_init_data after registration
A future patch is going to change semantics of clk_register() so that
clk_hw::init is guaranteed to be NULL after a clk is registered. Avoid
referencing this member here so that we don't run into NULL pointer
exceptions.
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
---
Please ack so I can take this through clk tree
drivers/clk/sprd/common.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/common.c b/drivers/clk/sprd/common.c
index a5bdca1de5d0..9d56eac43832 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sprd/common.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/common.c
@@ -76,16 +76,17 @@ int sprd_clk_probe(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clkhw)
struct clk_hw *hw;
for (i = 0; i < clkhw->num; i++) {
+ const char *name;
hw = clkhw->hws[i];
-
if (!hw)
continue;
+ name = hw->init->name;
ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, hw);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Couldn't register clock %d - %s\n",
- i, hw->init->name);
+ i, name);
return ret;
}
}
--
Sent by a computer through tubes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists