linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] ReST conversion patches not applied yet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 Jul 2019 17:26:13 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@...l.ru>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ReST conversion patches not applied yet

Em Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:20:07 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> escreveu:

> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 02:17:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org> wrote:  
> 
> > > As promised, this is the rebased version of the patches that were not applied
> > > from the /26 patch series because you had merge conflicts.
> > > 
> > > They're all based on your docs-next branch, so should apply fine.
> > > 
> > > The first one fixes all but one error with a broken reference.
> > > 
> > > The only broken reference right now is due to a DT patch with was not
> > > accepted (no idea why), but whose driver is upstream.  
> 
> > All but 5/6 applied, thanks.  
> 
> Oh, I still hadn't reviewed this version of the SPI stuff :(

It is basically the one sent on that /26 patch series, just rebased
on the top of docs-next.

> There were outstanding questions about where it was going to get moved
> to but if I read the diff correctly it looks like it didn't actually get
> moved in the end?

Yeah, it doesn't have the move. My understanding from our discussions
is that we didn't reach a conclusion.

In any case, I can send a separate patch with the move part once
we reach an agreement about what's the best way to proceed (or you
can do it directly, if you prefer so).

Thanks,
Mauro