[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f28e8440-a57d-e269-f3a8-5bf5b9fcd41f@electromag.com.au>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:42:16 +0800
From: Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/57] iio: Remove dev_err() usage after
platform_get_irq()
G'day Stephen,
A comment unrelated to your change.
On 31/07/2019 02:15, Stephen Boyd wrote:
....
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> index 32f1c4a33b20..abe99856c823 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.c
> @@ -1179,10 +1179,8 @@ static int at91_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> idev->info = &at91_adc_info;
>
> st->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (st->irq < 0) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No IRQ ID is designated\n");
> + if (st->irq < 0)
> return -ENODEV;
Should this be returning st->irq instead of -ENODEV?
eg: platform_get_irq can return -EPROBE_DEFER
Pattern is repeated in a number of other places.
> - }
>
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>
Regards
Phil Reid
Powered by blists - more mailing lists