lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 31 Jul 2019 09:39:12 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 36/57] pwm: Remove dev_err() usage after
 platform_get_irq()

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:13:01AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 08:58:53AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:15:36AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > We don't need dev_err() messages when platform_get_irq() fails now that
> > > platform_get_irq() prints an error message itself when something goes
> > > wrong. Let's remove these prints with a simple semantic patch.
> > 
> > Looking at v5.3-rc2 it's not obvious to me that all error paths of
> > platform_get_irq issue an error message. Do I miss something?
> 
> The commit is in my driver-core tree at the moment, so this should wait
> until 5.4-rc1.  I woudn't recommend merging it in 5.3-rc as it's not a
> bugfix.

As this is a new change pointing out its id in the commit log of the
follow up changes might be beneficial.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ