[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <820e2ea9-14a2-795c-9b78-e8f2a30afdb1@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 09:57:12 +0100
From: Thomas Preston <thomas.preston@...ethink.co.uk>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Kirill Marinushkin <kmarinushkin@...dec.tech>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Annaliese McDermond <nh6z@...z.net>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Patrick Glaser <pglaser@...la.com>,
Rob Duncan <rduncan@...la.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Nate Case <ncase@...la.com>,
Cheng-Yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] ASoC: Add codec driver for ST TDA7802
On 31/07/2019 07:06, Marco Felsch wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> again sorry for jumping in..
>
Np!
> On 19-07-30 18:26, Thomas Preston wrote:
>> On 30/07/2019 15:58, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:09:36PM +0100, Thomas Preston wrote:
>>>> + case SND_SOC_BIAS_STANDBY:
>>>> + err = regulator_enable(tda7802->enable_reg);
>>>> + if (err < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(component->dev, "Could not enable.\n");
>>>> + return err;
>>>> + }
>>>> + dev_dbg(component->dev, "Regulator enabled\n");
>>>> + msleep(ENABLE_DELAY_MS);
>>>
>>> Is this delay needed by the device or is it for the regulator to ramp?
>>> If it's for the regulator to ramp then the regulator should be doing it.
>>>
>>
>> According to the datasheet the device itself takes 10ms to rise from 0V
>> after PLLen is enabled. There are additional rise times but they are
>> negligible with default capacitor configuration (which we have).
>>
>> Good to know about the regulator rising configuration though. Thanks.
>
> Isn't it the regulator we mentioned to not use that because it is a
> GPIO?
>
Yeah it is - I intend to switch PLLen to gpio API.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists