linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Implement ucall() for s390x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190731130508.uavb75ct2ck2pp66@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:05:08 +0200
From:   Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Implement ucall() for s390x

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 02:57:38PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 31/07/19 13:16, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > Or maybe even better: Let's move this file into lib/x86_64/ and
> > lib/aarch64/ instead, since there is more different code between the
> > architectures here than common code.
> 
> All good solutions, just choose one. :))
>

Agreed, and I like this last solution (move to arch-code) the best.

Thanks,
drew