[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMirq=42Cj4kT=dLSqUiG-yee5zuqFhg5t=ud5KPmQJYBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:21:35 +0200
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Cc: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable SPI_STM32_QSPI support
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 3:20 PM Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:48 AM Alexandre Torgue
> <alexandre.torgue@...com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Olof
> >
> > On 7/30/19 7:36 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > Hi Patrice,
> > >
> > > If you cc soc@...nel.org on patches you want us to apply, you'll get
> > > them automatically tracked by patchwork.
> > >
> >
> > Does it means that you will take it directly in arm-soc tree ?
> > I mean, I used to take this kind of patch (multi-v7_defconfig patch
> > linked to STM32 driver) in my stm32 branch and to send PR for them.
>
> You can do that too -- it was unclear to me whether you posted the
> patch with us in the To: line because you wanted it applied or not.
Also, we request that platform maintainers keep the defconfig updates
in a separate branch, since we normally track them in a separate
branch on our side. So if you do it in the future, please send
separate PR.
For single patches, it's just as easy to send us the patch as a pull request.
Thanks,
-Olof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists