lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:11:33 +0000 From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com> To: Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] x86/mm/tlb: Remove UV special case > On Jul 18, 2019, at 7:25 PM, Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com> wrote: > > It is a fact that the UV is still the UV and SGI is now part of HPE. The > current external product is known as SuperDome Flex. It is both up to date > as well as very well maintained. The ACK I provided was an okay to change > the code, but please make the description accurate. Looking at the code again, if I remove the call to uv_flush_tlb_others(), is there any use for tlb_uv.c?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists