[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190731151926.GV12733@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:49:26 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: imx-dma: Mark expected switch fall-through
On 29-07-19, 17:52, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm):
>
> drivers/dma/imx-dma.c: In function ‘imxdma_xfer_desc’:
> drivers/dma/imx-dma.c:542:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> if (slot == IMX_DMA_2D_SLOT_A) {
> ^
> drivers/dma/imx-dma.c:559:2: note: here
> case IMXDMA_DESC_MEMCPY:
> ^~~~
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is
> modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists