[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nhw5tmd7zCAyAA32ekW01GYPqcJbTMCVeUpaeb7dWTKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 02:00:41 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Shawn Landden <shawn@....icu>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo
keyword for switch/case use
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:07 AM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> Note also that this doesn't actually _use_ fallthrough
> it just reserves it.
If we are reserving it, we should be giving a compile error instead. I
don't see how users will understand they shouldn't use it just yet (it
is the same as adding it, which actually looks more like
encouragement!).
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists