[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8oK22Su5mq=i3pnKrkPq85a3hX-kyog9xwAVYa705iYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 23:17:05 +0300
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-next 20190731 - aegis128-core.c fails to build
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 09:08, Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 01 Aug 2019 09:04:11 +0300, Ard Biesheuvel said:
>
> > The fact that crypto_aegis128_have_simd() does get optimized away, but
> > crypto_aegis128_update_simd() doesn't (which is only called directly
> > and not via a function pointer like the other two routines) makes me
> > suspicious that this is some pathology in the compiler. Is this a
> > distro build of gcc? Also, which architecture are you compiling for?
>
> It's the Fedora Rawhide build on x86_64.
>
> [/usr/src/linux-next] gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 9.1.1 20190605 (Red Hat 9.1.1-2)
> Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>
Strange.
Does the following patch make any difference?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20190729074434.21064-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists