[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190801035549.GH2713@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 05:55:49 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, joel@....id.au, f.fainelli@...il.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: ftgmac100: Add support for DT
phy-handle property
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 03:09:58PM +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> phy-handle is necessary for the AST2600 which separates the MDIO
> controllers from the MAC.
>
> I've tried to minimise the intrusion of supporting the AST2600 to the
> FTGMAC100 by leaving in place the existing MDIO support for the embedded
> MDIO interface. The AST2400 and AST2500 continue to be supported this
> way, as it avoids breaking/reworking existing devicetrees.
>
> The AST2600 support by contrast requires the presence of the phy-handle
> property in the MAC devicetree node to specify the appropriate PHY to
> associate with the MAC. In the event that someone wants to specify the
> MDIO bus topology under the MAC node on an AST2400 or AST2500, the
> current auto-probe approach is done conditional on the absence of an
> "mdio" child node of the MAC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists