[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190801230810.21570-6-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 16:07:58 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/18] rcu/nocb: Remove deferred wakeup checks for extended quiescent states
The idea behind the checks for extended quiescent states at the end of
__call_rcu_nocb() is to handle cases where call_rcu() is invoked directly
from within an extended quiescent state, for example, from the idle loop.
However, this will result in a timer-mediated deferred wakeup, which
will cause the needed wakeup to happen within a jiffy or thereabouts.
There should be no forward-progress concerns, and if there are, the proper
response is to exit the extended quiescent state while executing the
endless blast of call_rcu() invocations, for example, using RCU_NONIDLE().
Given the more realistic case of an isolated call_rcu() invocation, there
should be no problem.
This commit therefore removes the checks for invoking call_rcu() within
an extended quiescent state for on no-CBs CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index fc6133eed50a..9936a66b80bb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1709,16 +1709,6 @@ static bool __call_rcu_nocb(struct rcu_data *rdp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
-atomic_long_read(&rdp->nocb_q_count_lazy),
-rcu_get_n_cbs_nocb_cpu(rdp));
- /*
- * If called from an extended quiescent state with interrupts
- * disabled, invoke the RCU core in order to allow the idle-entry
- * deferred-wakeup check to function.
- */
- if (irqs_disabled_flags(flags) &&
- !rcu_is_watching() &&
- cpu_online(smp_processor_id()))
- invoke_rcu_core();
-
return true;
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists