linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/18] rcu/nocb: Add checks for offloaded callback processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190801230810.21570-3-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu,  1 Aug 2019 16:07:55 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/18] rcu/nocb: Add checks for offloaded callback processing

This commit is a preparatory patch for offloaded callbacks using the
same ->cblist structure used by non-offloaded callbacks.  It therefore
adds rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded() calls where they will be needed when
!rcu_segcblist_is_enabled() no longer flags the offloaded case.  It also
adds checks in rcu_do_batch() to ensure that there are no missed checks:
Currently, it should not be possible for offloaded execution to reach
rcu_do_batch(), though this will change later in this series.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 6f5c96c4f9a3..969ba292a669 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -210,7 +210,8 @@ static long rcu_get_n_cbs_cpu(int cpu)
 {
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
 
-	if (rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist)) /* Online normal CPU? */
+	if (rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist) &&
+	    !rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist)) /* Online normal CPU? */
 		return rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
 	return rcu_get_n_cbs_nocb_cpu(rdp); /* Works for offline, too. */
 }
@@ -2081,6 +2082,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	struct rcu_cblist rcl = RCU_CBLIST_INITIALIZER(rcl);
 	long bl, count;
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->cblist.offloaded);
 	/* If no callbacks are ready, just return. */
 	if (!rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist)) {
 		trace_rcu_batch_start(rcu_state.name,
@@ -2299,7 +2301,8 @@ static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
 
 	/* No grace period and unregistered callbacks? */
 	if (!rcu_gp_in_progress() &&
-	    rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist)) {
+	    rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist) &&
+	    !rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist)) {
 		local_irq_save(flags);
 		if (!rcu_segcblist_restempty(&rdp->cblist, RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL))
 			rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked(rnp, rdp);
@@ -2514,7 +2517,8 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func, int cpu, bool lazy)
 	rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
 
 	/* Add the callback to our list. */
-	if (unlikely(!rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist)) || cpu != -1) {
+	if (unlikely(!rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist)) ||
+	    rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist) || cpu != -1) {
 		int offline;
 
 		if (cpu != -1)
@@ -2750,6 +2754,7 @@ static int rcu_pending(void)
 	/* Has RCU gone idle with this CPU needing another grace period? */
 	if (!rcu_gp_in_progress() &&
 	    rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist) &&
+	    !rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist) &&
 	    !rcu_segcblist_restempty(&rdp->cblist, RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL))
 		return 1;
 
-- 
2.17.1