[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c77d0ef4-4388-67cc-77a0-1c87baa82bd4@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 05:07:22 +0000
From: Tao Ren <taoren@...com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Arun Parameswaran <arun.parameswaran@...adcom.com>,
Justin Chen <justinpopo6@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
"openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: broadcom: add 1000Base-X support
for BCM54616S
On 7/30/19 10:55 PM, Tao Ren wrote:
> On 7/30/19 7:34 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> The BCM54616S PHY on my machine is connected to a BCM5396 switch chip over backplane (1000Base-KX).
>>
>> Ah, that is different. So the board is using it for RGMII to 1000Base-KX?
>>
>> phy-mode is about the MAC-PHY link. So in this case RGMII.
>
> Yes. It's RGMII to 1000Base-KX.
>
>> There is no DT way to configure the PHY-Switch link. However, it
>> sounds like you have the PHY strapped so it is doing 1000BaseX on the
>> PHY-Switch link. So do you actually need to configure this?
>
> The PHY is strapped in RGMII-Fiber Mode (the term used in datasheet), but besides 1000BaseX, 100Base-FX is also supported in this mode.
> The datasheet doesn't say which link type (1000BaseX or 100Base-FX) is active after reset and I cannot find a way to auto-detect the link type, either.
I found bit 0 of 100-FX control register can be used to detect PHY-switch link type (means DT is not needed). Will run more testing and send out v2 patch soon. Thank you all for the input and help.
Cheers,
Tao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists