lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190801071709.GE11627@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Thu, 1 Aug 2019 09:17:09 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@...il.com>
Cc:     Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        pasha.tatashin@...een.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        anshuman.khandual@....com, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Allocate memmap from hotadded memory

On Thu 01-08-19 09:06:40, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 14:08 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 02-07-19 18:52:01, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > 2) Why it was designed, what is the goal of the interface?
> > > > 3) When it is supposed to be used?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > There is a hardware debugging facility (htm) on some power chips.
> > > To use
> > > this you need a contiguous portion of memory for the output to be
> > > dumped
> > > to - and we obviously don't want this memory to be simultaneously
> > > used by
> > > the kernel.
> > 
> > How much memory are we talking about here? Just curious.
> 
> From what I've seen a couple of GB per node, so maybe 2-10GB total.

OK, that is really a lot to keep around unused just in case the
debugging is going to be used.

I am still not sure the current approach of (ab)using memory hotplug is
ideal. Sure there is some overlap but you shouldn't really need to
offline the required memory range at all. All you need is to isolate the
memory from any existing user and the page allocator. Have you checked
alloc_contig_range?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ