linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] lseek on /proc/meminfo is broken in 4.19.59

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9e0b13fb-8355-0430-557d-6b67e2ba2aac@farpost.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:52:36 +1000
From:   Sergei Turchanov <turchanov@...post.com>
To:     Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] lseek on /proc/meminfo is broken in 4.19.59

Hi,

Thank you very much for your suggestion. Will certainly do that.

With best regards,
Sergei.

On 01.08.2019 17:11, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just took a glance, maybe due to
> commit 1f4aace60b0e ("fs/seq_file.c: simplify seq_file iteration code and interface")
>
> I simply reverted it just now and it seems fine... but I haven't digged into this commit.
>
> Maybe you could Cc NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> for some more advice and
> I have no idea whether it's an expected behavior or not...
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>
> On 2019/8/1 14:16, Sergei Turchanov wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> (I sent this e-mail two weeks ago with no feedback. Does anyone care? Wrong mailing list? Anything....?)
>>
>> Seeking (to an offset within file size) in /proc/meminfo is broken in 4.19.59. It does seek to a desired position, but reading from that position returns the remainder of file and then a whole copy of file. This doesn't happen with /proc/vmstat or /proc/self/maps for example.
>>
>> Seeking did work correctly in kernel 4.14.47. So it seems something broke in the way.
>>
>> Background: this kind of access pattern (seeking to /proc/meminfo) is used by libvirt-lxc fuse driver for virtualized view of /proc/meminfo. So that /proc/meminfo is broken in guests when running kernel 4.19.x.
>>
>> $ ./test /proc/meminfo 0        # Works as expected
>>
>> MemTotal:       394907728 kB
>> MemFree:        173738328 kB
>> ...
>> DirectMap2M:    13062144 kB
>> DirectMap1G:    390070272 kB
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> $ ./test 1024                   # returns a copy of file after the remainder
>>
>> Will seek to 1024
>>
>>
>> Data read at offset 1024
>> gePages:         0 kB
>> ShmemHugePages:        0 kB
>> ShmemPmdMapped:        0 kB
>> HugePages_Total:       0
>> HugePages_Free:        0
>> HugePages_Rsvd:        0
>> HugePages_Surp:        0
>> Hugepagesize:       2048 kB
>> Hugetlb:               0 kB
>> DirectMap4k:      245204 kB
>> DirectMap2M:    13062144 kB
>> DirectMap1G:    390070272 kB
>> MemTotal:       394907728 kB
>> MemFree:        173738328 kB
>> MemAvailable:   379989680 kB
>> Buffers:          355812 kB
>> Cached:         207216224 kB
>> ...
>> DirectMap2M:    13062144 kB
>> DirectMap1G:    390070272 kB
>>
>> As you see, after "DirectMap1G:" line, a whole copy of /proc/meminfo returned by "read".
>>
>> Test program:
>>
>> #include <sys/types.h>
>> #include <sys/stat.h>
>> #include <unistd.h>
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>>
>> #define SIZE 1024
>> char buf[SIZE + 1];
>>
>> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
>>      int     fd;
>>      ssize_t rd;
>>      off_t   ofs = 0;
>>
>>      if (argc < 2) {
>>          printf("Usage: test <file> [<offset>]\n");
>>          exit(1);
>>      }
>>
>>      if (-1 == (fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY))) {
>>          perror("open failed");
>>          exit(1);
>>      }
>>
>>      if (argc > 2) {
>>          ofs = atol(argv[2]);
>>      }
>>      printf("Will seek to %ld\n", ofs);
>>
>>      if (-1 == (lseek(fd, ofs, SEEK_SET))) {
>>          perror("lseek failed");
>>          exit(1);
>>      }
>>
>>      for (;; ofs += rd) {
>>          printf("\n\nData read at offset %ld\n", ofs);
>>          if (-1 == (rd = read(fd, buf, SIZE))) {
>>              perror("read failed");
>>              exit(1);
>>          }
>>          buf[rd] = '\0';
>>          printf(buf);
>>          if (rd < SIZE) {
>>              break;
>>          }
>>      }
>>
>>      return 0;
>> }
>>
>>
>>