linux-kernel - Re: 答复: [PATCH RFC] ubi: ubi_wl_get_peb: Replace a limited number of attempts with polling while getting PEB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1515821930.55881.1564651254907.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date:   Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:20:54 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Cc:     yi zhang <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH RFC] ubi: ubi_wl_get_peb: Replace a limited number of attempts with polling while getting PEB

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "chengzhihao1" <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
> An: "richard" <richard@....at>, "yi zhang" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
> CC: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. August 2019 11:13:20
> Betreff: 答复: [PATCH RFC] ubi: ubi_wl_get_peb: Replace a limited number of attempts with polling while getting PEB

> I don't quite understand why a limited number of attempts have been made to get
> a free PEB in ubi_wl_get_peb (in fastmap-wl.c). I proposed this PATCH with
> reference to the implementation of ubi_wl_get_peb (in wl.c). As far as I know,
> getting PEB by polling probably won't fall into soft-lockup.
> ubi_update_fastmap may add new tasks (including erase task or wl taskk, wl tasks
> generally do not generate additional free PEBs) to ubi->works, and
> produce_free_peb will eventually complete all tasks in ubi->works or obtain an
> free PEB that can be filled into pool.

You send this patch three times, I guess your mail setup has issues? :-)
 
This is one of the darkest corners of Fastmap where things get messy.
The number of retry attempts was limited to avoid a live lock.

I agree that allowing only one retry is a little to few.
With nandsim, a small nand and a fast PC you can hit that.

Do you have numbers how many attempts were needed to get a free block?

Thanks,
//richard