[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb72af16-d775-de39-498b-5e64976d93de@kaod.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:31:35 +0200
From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
allison@...utok.net, tglx@...utronix.de, groug@...d.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/xive: Add some error handling code to
'xive_spapr_init()'
On 01/08/2019 13:09, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 'xive_irq_bitmap_add()' can return -ENOMEM.
> In this case, we should free the memory already allocated and return
> 'false' to the caller.
>
> Also add an error path which undoes the 'tima = ioremap(...)'
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> NOT compile tested (I don't have a cross compiler and won't install one).
All distros have a packaged powerpc cross compiler.
Then, you need to compile a kernel for a pseries machine and run a pseries
machine with it under QEMU. You can use a simple ppc initrd, a net install
one for example.
You could also hack the device tree in QEMU to torture the XIVE sPAPR driver.
Nothing too complex, all is here :
https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=hw/intc/spapr_xive.c;h=097f88d4608d8ba160526756a3a224e5176b6e0f;hb=HEAD#l1427
> So if some correction or improvement are needed, feel free to propose and
> commit it directly.
Yes there is I think. I would move at the end all the code that needs a
rollback.
Thanks for taking a look, I might do that one day.
Cheers,
C.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/spapr.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/spapr.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/spapr.c
> index 52198131c75e..b3ae0b76c433 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/spapr.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/spapr.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,17 @@ static int xive_irq_bitmap_add(int base, int count)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void xive_irq_bitmap_remove_all(void)
> +{
> + struct xive_irq_bitmap *xibm, *tmp;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(xibm, tmp, &xive_irq_bitmaps, list) {
> + list_del(&xibm->list);
> + kfree(xibm->bitmap);
> + kfree(xibm);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int __xive_irq_bitmap_alloc(struct xive_irq_bitmap *xibm)
> {
> int irq;
> @@ -723,7 +734,7 @@ bool __init xive_spapr_init(void)
> u32 val;
> u32 len;
> const __be32 *reg;
> - int i;
> + int i, err;
>
> if (xive_spapr_disabled())
> return false;
> @@ -748,23 +759,26 @@ bool __init xive_spapr_init(void)
> }
>
> if (!xive_get_max_prio(&max_prio))
> - return false;
> + goto err_unmap;
>
> /* Feed the IRQ number allocator with the ranges given in the DT */
> reg = of_get_property(np, "ibm,xive-lisn-ranges", &len);
> if (!reg) {
> pr_err("Failed to read 'ibm,xive-lisn-ranges' property\n");
> - return false;
> + goto err_unmap;
> }
>
> if (len % (2 * sizeof(u32)) != 0) {
> pr_err("invalid 'ibm,xive-lisn-ranges' property\n");
> - return false;
> + goto err_unmap;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < len / (2 * sizeof(u32)); i++, reg += 2)
> - xive_irq_bitmap_add(be32_to_cpu(reg[0]),
> - be32_to_cpu(reg[1]));
> + for (i = 0; i < len / (2 * sizeof(u32)); i++, reg += 2) {
> + err = xive_irq_bitmap_add(be32_to_cpu(reg[0]),
> + be32_to_cpu(reg[1]));
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto err_mem_free;
> + }
>
> /* Iterate the EQ sizes and pick one */
> of_property_for_each_u32(np, "ibm,xive-eq-sizes", prop, reg, val) {
> @@ -775,8 +789,14 @@ bool __init xive_spapr_init(void)
>
> /* Initialize XIVE core with our backend */
> if (!xive_core_init(&xive_spapr_ops, tima, TM_QW1_OS, max_prio))
> - return false;
> + goto err_mem_free;
>
> pr_info("Using %dkB queues\n", 1 << (xive_queue_shift - 10));
> return true;
> +
> +err_mem_free:
> + xive_irq_bitmap_remove_all();
> +err_unmap:
> + iounmap(tima);
> + return false;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists