[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190801230818.72fadeea8a58d1f657179b30@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 23:08:18 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>,
Daniel Diaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Matt Hart <matthew.hart@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] arm64: kprobes: Recover pstate.D in single-step
exception handler
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:16:22 +0100
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 05:15:54PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > kprobes manipulates the interrupted PSTATE for single step, and
> > doesn't restore it. Thus, if we put a kprobe where the pstate.D
> > (debug) masked, the mask will be cleared after the kprobe hits.
> >
> > Moreover, in the most complicated case, this can lead a kernel
> > crash with below message when a nested kprobe hits.
> >
> > [ 152.118921] Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1
> >
> > When the 1st kprobe hits, do_debug_exception() will be called.
> > At this point, debug exception (= pstate.D) must be masked (=1).
> > But if another kprobes hits before single-step of the first kprobe
> > (e.g. inside user pre_handler), it unmask the debug exception
> > (pstate.D = 0) and return.
> > Then, when the 1st kprobe setting up single-step, it saves current
> > DAIF, mask DAIF, enable single-step, and restore DAIF.
> > However, since "D" flag in DAIF is cleared by the 2nd kprobe, the
> > single-step exception happens soon after restoring DAIF.
> >
> > This has been introduced by commit 7419333fa15e ("arm64: kprobe:
> > Always clear pstate.D in breakpoint exception handler")
> >
> > To solve this issue, this stores all DAIF bits and restore it
> > after single stepping.
> >
> > Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
> > Fixes: commit 7419333fa15e ("arm64: kprobe: Always clear pstate.D in breakpoint exception handler")
> > Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> > Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Update patch description
> > - move PSR_DAIF_MASK in daifflags.h
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Save and restore all DAIF flags.
> > - Operate pstate directly and remove spsr_set_debug_flag().
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h | 2 ++
> > arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 39 +++++-------------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> I'm seeing an allmodconfig build failure with this:
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c: In function ‘kprobes_save_local_irqflag’:
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c:181:38: error: ‘DAIF_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘BIT_MASK’?
> kcb->saved_irqflag = regs->pstate & DAIF_MASK;
> ^~~~~~~~~
> BIT_MASK
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c:181:38: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c: In function ‘kprobes_restore_local_irqflag’:
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c:190:19: error: ‘DAIF_MASK’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘BIT_MASK’?
> regs->pstate &= ~DAIF_MASK;
> ^~~~~~~~~
> BIT_MASK
> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:274: arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.o] Error 1
Oops, daifflags.h is included via kvm_host.h...
OK, kprobes.c must include daifflags.h directly in this case.
I'll update this patch too.
Thank you,
>
> Will
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists